The cost of TikTok advertising in Finland: what it really costs
The cost of TikTok advertising is made up of three separate things, and mixing them together is why quotes from different agencies look impossible to compare. Once these three are separated, comparison is easy.
Three parts that have to be itemised
The media budget is the money that goes to TikTok. You pay it directly to the platform from your own ad account, and you see every cent yourself. In Finland a working minimum for ongoing activity is around €1,000 a month. With less than that the algorithm does not get to learn, and the results swing so much that nothing can be concluded from the data.
Content production is the making of the ad videos. Without it there is nothing to advertise. In the market the price ranges from around two hundred euros per video to several thousand, depending on whether you buy one-off or ongoing. We go through the logic in the article short-form video pricing.
Management is building, monitoring and optimising the campaigns. It is typically either a fixed monthly fee or a percentage of the media budget. In the percentage model the market usually sits between ten and twenty per cent, which means that on a small budget the percentage model is cheap but also lazy: nobody can be bothered to optimise a hundred euros a month.
If the quote has one number instead of these three, ask for a breakdown. Without it you do not know whether you are buying media or work.
How the auction works and what a click costs in Finland
On TikTok you do not buy impressions at a list price. Every time someone opens the app, the platform settles each ad slot separately in an auction. You compete for that slot against every other advertiser who wants to reach the same person at the same moment.
Two things decide the winner. One is your bid, meaning how much you are willing to pay for the event you want. The other is the platform's estimate of how likely this particular person is to react to this particular video. The latter is the part where money does not help directly. If your ad stops the viewer, you win the slot with a lower bid. If it does not, you pay more for the same impression.
For a small advertiser this leads to one practical conclusion. Do not try to outbid a big budget. Compete on quality and timing instead. In November and December every online shop is in the auction at the same time and prices rise clearly, whereas in January and February the same money buys considerably more. If your product is not tied to Christmas, do the testing in the quiet period and the scaling in peak season.
TikTok's click prices in Finland are typically lower than Meta's, because there are fewer advertisers and the auction is lighter. In practice the same budget buys more visibility, but the audience is younger on average.
Click price is still not the number to optimise. A cheap click from the wrong person is more expensive than an expensive click from the right one. Look instead at what one order or one enquiry cost. More on measurement in the article measuring social media marketing.
What the learning phase means in practice
When a campaign starts, the platform does not yet know who buys from you. It finds out by experimenting, and it needs a sufficient number of the same event, for example purchases or form submissions, before distribution settles. This search phase is called the learning phase, and during it prices swing wildly.
In practice this means two things. First: if you optimise for purchases and get a few a week, the campaign will never get out of the learning phase. Then it is better to optimise for an earlier event, such as add to cart, which happens often enough.
Second: every change to the budget, the targeting or the ads resets the learning. On an account that gets fiddled with every day, the campaigns are permanently in expensive search mode. Make changes once a week and look at periods of at least seven days.
This is also why splitting the budget is expensive. A thousand euros a month in one ad set can get out of the learning phase. The same thousand split into five ad sets of two hundred euros gets out in none of them, and you pay the price of the learning phase five times. Keep the structure boring: one ad set with several ad variations inside it. The platform divides the impressions between the variations itself, and the learning does not break.
The campaign objective decides the cost as much as the budget does
The same money buys completely different things depending on which objective you choose. This is the most common reason why two campaigns look impossible to compare in a report.
The reach objective buys eyeballs at the lowest possible cost per impression. It suits a launch and awareness, but it tells you nothing about sales, because the platform is looking for cheap impressions, not buyers.
The traffic objective buys clicks. Clicks are cheap and the report looks good, but some of the clickers leave the page before it has loaded. The traffic objective is mainly useful when the site does not yet have enough events for conversion optimisation.
The conversion objective is the most expensive per impression and usually the only relevant one in terms of outcome. It requires a working pixel or server-side measurement and a sufficient number of events. If both are in order, move here straight away.
In practice the order is this: the first two weeks on video views or traffic, so you see which creative works, and after that conversion. Do not judge a reach campaign by sales margin or a conversion campaign by cost per impression. They are different tools for different jobs.
Why the creative decides the price more than targeting does
Targeting was the decisive thing in 2018. Now it is not. TikTok finds the right audience itself once it gets enough signal. What you can influence is what happens on the screen.
Same product, same budget, same target group. Swap the ad video and the click price changes several times over. On TikTok this is steeper than on other platforms, because the ad competes directly with organic content in the same feed. An ad that looks like an ad gets skipped. This is not a question of style but of cost.
The number of ad variations shows directly on the bill. With one video the same audience sees the same thing over and over, frequency rises and the cost per impression rises with it. After three or four weeks the same video costs clearly more than in the first week, even though nothing else has changed.
The solution is not to shoot again every month. Four to six variations a month is enough for most, and most of them are re-edits of the same material: a new three-second opening, a different order, a different ending. A shoot day that produces ten editable pieces comes to a fraction per variation of what an individually bought video costs. The same logic applies to creator-made material, which we wrote about under what UGC content is.
Spark Ads: when you promote an existing organic video
Spark Ads is TikTok's own format where the ad runs from a real post. The video stays on your own account or the creator's account, and what is shown as the ad is that very post, not a separate copy.
The difference is bigger than it sounds. Likes, comments, shares and followers accumulate on the original post and do not disappear with the campaign. To the viewer the ad looks like an ordinary video with the creator's name, sound and comment section in place. The engagement rate is typically better, and because the platform judges ads precisely on reactions, better engagement often shows up as cheaper distribution.
The practical advantage is that you can promote videos that already work organically. Then the creative risk is smaller, because the audience has already voted. For a creator's video you need an authorisation code from the creator, and that should be agreed when the collaboration is agreed, not afterwards.
The caveats are worth knowing. The comment section is open, and if there is a problem with the product, it shows in the ad. A published video cannot be edited, so a fix means a new post. And organic success does not guarantee paid success: your followers already know you, the ad is seen by someone who does not. More on the role of your own account in the article a TikTok account for your business.
How to split the media budget between testing and scaling
The first weeks are one hundred per cent testing. At that stage there is nothing to scale, because you do not yet know what works.
Once a winner is found, a sensible split is roughly three quarters to what works and the rest to new experiments. On a monthly budget of fifteen hundred euros that means around eleven hundred euros for scaling and four hundred for new variations. The testing share must not be cut to zero even when results are good, because every winner dies sooner or later and the next one has to be ready by then.
Scaling is done in steps. Doubling the budget in one go throws the campaign back into the learning phase and the price rises exactly when it should be falling. Raise it by around twenty per cent at a time every few days and see what happens. When results start to weaken, look at frequency and the age of the ads first. Targeting is rarely the reason.
On our side this means in practice that the content pipeline is kept running the whole time, not just at the start of a campaign. The seven million monthly views generated with thirty partners do not come from individual videos but from the fact that there is always something new to test in the queue. If you want to outsource the whole structure, look at outsourced marketing team.
When not to start TikTok advertising
If you have no organic content at all, start there. Paid distribution without tested creative is an expensive way to learn what could have been learned for free. The reasoning is on the page paid advertising for businesses and in the article organic or paid.
If your margin per order is very thin, the maths is tight regardless of how well the advertising works. And if your customers are mostly well over fifty, the channel is probably the wrong one. We wrote about this in more detail: is TikTok advertising worth it for a business.
Two other situations are worth recognising early. If measurement is not in order and nobody can say where the orders come from, advertising produces opinions, not conclusions. And if the budget covers one month, do not start yet. One month is not even enough to get through the learning phase, and a campaign stopped halfway is purely a cost.
A realistic total budget
For a Finnish consumer brand starting out, the baseline is around €1,000–1,500 of media a month, plus content production on top. The first two months are learning, not return. At the end of the third month you will know whether this works for you.
Work out the whole three-month package in one go: media, enough ad variations per month and management. If any one of these is left out, the other two go to waste.
If you want the numbers for your own case, see the price list or book a short meeting. We will also go through whether you should be starting this at all.
Want the same result for your brand?
Book a short meeting